Shooting Stances: Isosceles vs Weaver vs Chapman
Having a proper shooting stance and grip gives you a strong foundation for all the other shooting fundamentals.
But don’t worry, we’ll go over the most popular shooting stances, from Isosceles to Weaver to Chapman (aka modified Weaver).
And then cover how to have a proper handgun grip that gives you maximum control and recoil dampening.
The isosceles stance gets its name from the arms and chest making an isosceles triangle. Kudos if you remember from geometry that isosceles means two sides are the same.
Configuration of Isosceles
Shooter faces the target squarely, feet are shoulder-width (or slightly wider) apart with toes pointed at the target. Arms are full extended with the gun in the middle of the chest.
There’s a slight lean forward and some bending of the knees.
Pros of Isosceles Stance
- Easier and more natural stance since you are merely “pointing” at the target.
- The body acts like a turret for easy movement to side targets. This stance is very popular in shooting competitions for easy transitions to different targets.
- Doesn’t really matter what eye dominance you are.
- If wearing body armor, you are getting more protection since you are square to the target.
Cons of Isosceles Stance
- Potentially less stable if you are pushed foward/backward (pretty stable for side to side), but this is minimized by bending your knees and putting your weight a little more forward.
- If not wearing body armor, you are exposing a bigger target.
Developed in the 1950’s by LA County Sheriff Jack Weaver and since popularized by Jeff Cooper and his firearms school, Gunsite. The shooter is more at an angle to the target and the arms are bent.
Non-dominant leg is forward of the dominant leg with a slight forward lean (“nose over toes”).
Toes are pointed forward and the firing-side arm is extended while the supporting arm is bend.
The shooter employs a “push-pull” grip by pushing with the firing arm and pulling back with the supporting arm.
Pros of Weaver Stance
- Smaller profile to target (“blading” your body”)
- Better recoil management with the push-pull method
- More stable since the feet are now staggered. Natural stance if you need to balance yourself.
Cons of Weaver Stance
- Harder to rotate to your non-dominant side since you feel like you’re binding yourself up. For example, the Gunsite instructor above would have a harder time rotating to his left.
- Harder for cross-dominant shooters (eg right hand dominant and left eye dominant) since the two are now no longer matched up.
- If in body armor, you expose your side which normally isn’t armored.
Modified Weaver Stance (Chapman Stance)
Pioneered by competitive shooter Ray Chapman. Very similar to the Weaver Stance except your shooting arm is fully locked out with the support arm bent downwards.
Same as Weaver above except the shooting arm is fully extended, almost like a rifle stock.
Some shooters will also create a cheek-weld on their upper arm (like me)
Pros of Chapman Stance
- All of the Weaver Stance
- Consistency of your arm “stock” and “cheek-weld” to be always the same, instead of hovering in the air with the Isosceles or Weaver.
- Better recoil management since the firing arm is fully extended
- Better for crossed-eye dominant shooters since by having a cheek-weld, the opposite eye is more in line with the firearm
Cons of Chapman Stance
- All of the Weaver Stance minus cross-dominant shooting
- Might strain the neck muscles
Verdict of the Best Stance
Another of my standard answers…it depends on what you like best and your application.
You can choose based on what comes more naturally to you, if you want to compete in shooting sports later, or if you have eye dominance issues. And in many cases, what your instructor prefers when you take a firearms class (you are going to take a class right?).
I prefer the Chapman stance because of our crossed-eye dominance issues.
I also like the feeling that my “rifle-stock” is always the same. And even though I do some competitive shooting, I don’t really see the moving side-to-side binding issue that much. But don’t take my word for it…try it out for yourself!